Jevons, M. P., and you will Parker, M. T. (1964). J. din. Path., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. M. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Live, We., and Nichols, Good. C. (1961).J. shoot. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, A. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., We . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. Nakagawa, M. (1960). Jap. J. damp. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and Williams, R. Elizabeth. 0. (1958). 3. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. Meters., Plotkin, S. A beneficial., Brachman, P. S., Fekety, F. Roentgen., and you kostenlose Apps Dating may Pidcoe, V. (1960). Research, N.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, Yards. T. (1966). Within the “New Scientific Foundation from Medicine Yearly Opinion” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. College or university off London area, The brand new Athlone Push, London area. Parker, M. T., Todinson, An excellent. J. H., and Williams, Roentgen. Age. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.
Pether, J. V. S. (1968).J. Hyg., C a great d . , 66,605. Poole, P. Yards., and you will Baker, J. R. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., twenty-five, 116-123. Declaration (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,nine, 115-118. Declaration (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., thirteen, 119-122. Declaration (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Declaration (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165, 167, 171. Rountree, P. Yards. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. Yards., and you will Asheshov, Age. H. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., twenty-six, 111-122. Rountree, P. Meters., and Freeman, B. Meters. (1955). Med. J. Aust., dos, 157-161. Ruys, An effective. C., and you will Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, twenty-five, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and you may Wilson, J. B. (1958). Was.3. moist. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C you d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Road. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Road. Buc
Tarr, H. A great. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. Watson, W. An effective. (1965). Vet. Rec., 77, 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. Roentgen., and Dixon, W. J. (1964). J. infect. Dis.,114, 179188.
Williams, R. Elizabeth. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., We . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, Roentgen. Age. O., and Jevons, M. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., I Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, R. Age. O., and you can Rippon, J. J. Hyg., Camb., fifty, 320-353. Williams, R. E. O., Rippon, J. Elizabeth., and you can Dowsett, L. Meters. (1953). Lancet, we, 510-514. Wilson, G. S., and Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, we, 647-649.
Hereditary Study from inside the Mini-bacteria DAVID A great. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, The united kingdomt I. Addition . 11. Segregation once the Evidence of Simple Hereditary Control . An excellent. The new genetic approach to biology . B. The new recognition away from segregation . 111. The cornerstone out-of Genetic Mapping . B. The latest sequencing out-of loci towards a good linkage chart: multi-basis crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Genetic fine-structure . Elizabeth. Deletion mapping . IV. Functional Genetic Screening . A. Popularity examination . Bplementation tests . C. Epistasis . V. Hereditary Research when you look at the Eukaryotic Microorganisms . A. General factors . 1. dos. Tetrad study . B. Hereditary study particularly bacteria 1. Aspergillus nidulans . . 2. Aspergillus niger or other “imperfect” fungus step 3. Neurospora crassa . cuatro. Almost every other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . six. Filamentous basidiomycetes . 7. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . 9. Ciliates . ten. Slime moulds VI. Genetic Study for the Prokaryotes . A beneficial. General considerations . step 1. Fertility items and you can conjugational mapping . 2. Transduction and you will co-transduction . 3. Transformation and you will co-transformation 4. Non-selective research .
fifty 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94
Hereditary data particularly bacteria step one. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium or other Enteric bacterium . 2. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and you can Ps. putida . step three. Bacillus subtilis cuatro. Streptmyces coelicolor or any other actinomycetes . 5. Other bacteria C. Authoritative mapping strategies independent out of recombination VII. Genetic Data in Worms Good. Standard considerations . step 1. Form of widespread genomes 2. Special features from virus genetics B. Genetic data in particular viruses step one. Bacteriophages dos. Creature worms step 3. Bush worms VIII. Finishing Remarks Records .